Re: SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS DON'T READ if you have not seen Wonder Woman 84

Posted by mechaMenace on
URL: http://mondo-coolmunity-forums.167.s1.nabble.com/SPOILERS-SPOILERS-SPOILERS-DON-T-READ-if-you-have-not-seen-Wonder-Woman-84-tp1205p1210.html

I wish I hadn't heard someone's two-word reaction prior to seeing Wonder Woman 84, but I don't think mine would have been any different. You know I like to go into these things with a fresh mind. If anything, the first movie set me up for high times.

Who thought hiring Kristen Wig as the nemesis was a good idea? I get it. She's pretty good at being serious and very affable as a comedian so we can feel remorse when she gave up her poetic humanity to turn into an apex predator. She's a cute 50 year-old, but not the sexy cheetarah she needs to be going up against Gadot's model-like beauty.

Women empowerment aside, I can't believe the wardrobe and makeup make her twenty years younger and model-hot (given the wish she made, I guess the wish included fashion sense too). Don't get me wrong; Wig would probably be fun, but just like my Freddy Kreuger face might entice Wendy from Howard Stern's wack pack, most people wouldn't give either the time of day.

I was not passionately looking forward to WW84 even though this rant makes me sound like it, but yes, I was extremely disappointed (in a Hercules: The Legendary Journeys meme voice [look it up]). I liked the first one because it surprised me. I watched it because it was a comic book movie but there was no Batman and no Justice League team-up so why should I care? WW1 made me care about WW. She kicked ass. She was cool. WW84 was a hallmark production. what the FFFF